seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Its enforcement with the provision of capital punishment or life imprisonment underscores the value of human life as well as the importance of maintaining legislation and order in society.
Case legislation is specific towards the jurisdiction in which it was rendered. For instance, a ruling in a very California appellate court would not usually be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID essential) to criminal case information in participating Circuit Courts to the purpose of confirming of the individual’s date of birth.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
seventy three . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Touching on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 from the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice just isn't served, the grievance petition could be dismissed. This is because service with the grievance notice is often a mandatory requirement in addition to a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law necessitates that a grievance notice be served to the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. Should the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In case the organization is transprovincial.
The court cannot hear the transfer order challenge mainly because it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge here the private respondents' appointment orders maintaining in view that one of many respondents has retired from service as pointed out via the counsel for your respondent university. twelve. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order as to costs. Read more
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it demands legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be made and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
Although a lot of websites offer free case regulation, not all are equally reliable. It’s vital to evaluate the credibility with the source before relying on the information.
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It will involve the execution with the convicted person like a consequence of their crime.
Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by legislation." It can be very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust accessible remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
13309-B of 2010 to generally be weak types of evidence as well as evidentiary value whereof would be viewed within the time from the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Consequently, confirmed custody of your petitioner in jail is unlikely to serve any useful purpose at this stage.”
To receive notification from the Supreme Court of Virginia as well as Court of Appeals of Virginia when opinions, orders, rule changes, dockets and other information has become obtainable, please enter your contact information below.